hi all
thanks for the support :)
APC have asked if its okay they submit my name as CS candidate,
and ive said yes to that. I dont feel like nominating myself, but
if the HR Caucus wants to propose my name, thereby perhaps giving
us a better chance to have a HR person in the MAG, you are of
course welcome to do so.
Ill forward the needed info. to meryem just in case.
best rikke
-----Oprindelig meddelelse-----
Fra: Ginger Paque [mailto:ginger@paque.net]
Sendt: ma 10-04-2006 15:36
Til: hr-wsis@iris.sgdg.org
Emne: [hr-wsis] Re: Fwd: Nominations to IGF Advisory Committee -
Info
Hello all,
I agree with you, Meryem, that 3 is a good option, and that it
might be best for us to nominate someone, i.e. Rikke for an IGC
nomination, and to nominate this person in name of the HR caucus
as well.
I strongly feel that it is important to have a qualified HR
person on the MAG, and that we should use all possible avenues to
achieve this.
To speed matters up, perhaps Rikke could do a self-nomination,
because she can give the best information for the nomination, and
then those who want to can endorse it?
Thanks, Ginger
----- Original Message ----- From: Meryem Marzouki To: hr-
wsis@iris.sgdg.org Sent: Monday, April 10, 2006 4:55 AM
Subject: [hr-wsis] Fwd: Nominations to IGF Advisory Committee -
Info
Hi all,
In addition to these two possibilities below, I forgot to add a
third one:
(3) The HR caucus recommends its own list of people directly to
the IGF.
In fact, the nomination through the nomcom process is an
internet governance caucus process (although open to others).
Its final list of recommended people will be people
recommended by the IGC. But their will certainly be other
recommendations by other constituencies/ groups/ organizations/
individuals.
Frankly, I have no idea what would be best. Maybe (3):
In case someone we want to recommend (e.g. Rikke, but we can
add others too) is also nominated by the IGC/nomcom, then
following way (3) may give more chances.
Meryem
Début du message réexpédié :
>
> The HR caucus may now proceed in two ways:
> (1) We decide as a caucus, to submit some names with the
required > information. This would provide an addition
information to the > nomcom that it may use (or not) in its
selection. This additional > information is: "this list of
people are supported by the HR > caucus". Please note that the
selection is however based on the > individual capacities of
proposed peoples, and this additional > information is by no
mean a guaranteed "added-value" to the proosal
> or
> (2) We don't do anything, and interested people can apply
either by > self-submitting their names or by having their
names submitted by > others. Non self-submission should make
sure that the proposed > person agrees on his/her nomination.
But please keep the caucus > informed of any (self-)nomination
of/by its members, thanks.
--
Working List of the WSIS Human Rights Caucus
Web site : http://www.iris.sgdg.org/actions/smsi/hr-wsis
Public Archives: http://www.iris.sgdg.org/actions/smsi/hr-wsis/
list
To post a message to the list, send an email to: hr-
wsis@iris.sgdg.org
To subscribe/unsubscribe, send an email to:
Meryem.Marzouki@iris.sgdg.org
--
Working List of the WSIS Human Rights Caucus
Web site : http://www.iris.sgdg.org/actions/smsi/hr-wsis
Public Archives: http://www.iris.sgdg.org/actions/smsi/hr-wsis/list
To post a message to the list, send an email to: hr-
wsis@iris.sgdg.org
To subscribe/unsubscribe, send an email to:
Meryem.Marzouki@iris.sgdg.org
