Fwd: [hr-wsis] Nominations to IGF Advisory Committee - Info

[Meryem Marzouki <marzouki@ras.eu.org>]

Hi all,

In addition to these two possibilities below, I forgot to add a third  
one:
(3) The HR caucus recommends its own list of people directly to the IGF.
In fact, the nomination through the nomcom process is an internet  
governance caucus process (although open to others). Its final list  
of recommended people will be people recommended by the IGC. But  
their will certainly be other recommendations by other  
constituencies/ groups/ organizations/individuals.

Frankly, I have no idea what would be best. Maybe (3):
In case someone we want to recommend (e.g. Rikke, but we can add  
others too) is also nominated by the IGC/nomcom, then following way  
(3) may give more chances.
Meryem

Début du message réexpédié :

> The HR caucus may now proceed in two ways:
> (1) We decide as a caucus, to submit some  names with the required  
> information. This would provide an addition information to the  
> nomcom that it may use (or not) in its selection. This additional  
> information is: "this list of people are supported by the HR  
> caucus". Please note that the selection is however based on the  
> individual capacities of proposed peoples, and this additional  
> information is by no mean a guaranteed "added-value" to the proosal
> or
> (2) We don't do anything, and interested people can apply either by  
> self-submitting their names or by having their names submitted by  
> others. Non self-submission should make sure that the proposed  
> person agrees on his/her nomination. But please keep the caucus  
> informed of any (self-)nomination of/by its members, thanks.