Ginger,
Thanks for this.
We have long discussed the need to have
HR present at this.
If I understand Rikke's message from yesterday, she is willing.
I hope that she and Meryem (I saw her messages too) can continue to
lead the HR in this new process.
What is required for the nomination?
Let us proceed.
WJM
Ginger Paque wrote:
Hello all,
I agree with you, Meryem, that 3 is
a good option, and that it might be best for us to nominate someone,
i.e. Rikke for an IGC nomination, and to nominate this person in name
of the HR caucus as well.
I strongly feel that it is important
to have a qualified HR person on the MAG, and that we should use all
possible avenues to achieve this.
To speed matters up, perhaps Rikke
could do a self-nomination, because she can give the best information
for the nomination, and then those who want to can endorse it?
Thanks, Ginger
-----
Original Message -----
Sent:
Monday, April 10, 2006 4:55 AM
Subject:
[hr-wsis] Fwd: Nominations to IGF Advisory Committee - Info
Hi all,
In addition to these two possibilities below, I forgot to add a third
one:
(3) The HR caucus recommends its own list of people directly to the IGF.
In fact, the nomination through the nomcom process is an internet
governance caucus process (although open to others). Its final list
of recommended people will be people recommended by the IGC. But
their will certainly be other recommendations by other
constituencies/ groups/ organizations/individuals.
Frankly, I have no idea what would be best. Maybe (3):
In case someone we want to recommend (e.g. Rikke, but we can add
others too) is also nominated by the IGC/nomcom, then following way
(3) may give more chances.
Meryem
Début du message réexpédié :
>
> The HR caucus may now proceed in two ways:
> (1) We decide as a caucus, to submit some names with the
required
> information. This would provide an addition information to the
> nomcom that it may use (or not) in its selection. This additional
> information is: "this list of people are supported by the HR
> caucus". Please note that the selection is however based on the
> individual capacities of proposed peoples, and this additional
> information is by no mean a guaranteed "added-value" to the proosal
> or
> (2) We don't do anything, and interested people can apply either
by
> self-submitting their names or by having their names submitted by
> others. Non self-submission should make sure that the proposed
> person agrees on his/her nomination. But please keep the caucus
> informed of any (self-)nomination of/by its members, thanks.
--
Working List of the WSIS Human Rights Caucus
Web site : http://www.iris.sgdg.org/actions/smsi/hr-wsis
Public Archives: http://www.iris.sgdg.org/actions/smsi/hr-wsis/list
To post a message to the list, send an email to: hr-wsis@iris.sgdg.org
To subscribe/unsubscribe, send an email to: Meryem.Marzouki@iris.sgdg.org
--
Bill McIver
People-Centred Technologies group
National Research Council Canada Institute for Information Technology
URL: http://nrc.gc.ca
|
