[Précédent par date] [Index par date] [Suivant by date] [Précédent par thème] [Index par thème] [Suivant par thème]
[Previous by date] [Index by date] [Next by date] [Previous by thread] [Index by thread] [Next by thread]Re: [hr-wsis] SV: Re: HR caucus and post-wsis actions lines
- To: <hr-wsis@iris.sgdg.org>
- Subject: Re: [hr-wsis] SV: Re: HR caucus and post-wsis actions lines
- From: "Ginger Paque" <ginger@paque.net>
- Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2006 07:17:20 -0400
- References: <432D5217762BB14D866359BFCB972BA4010751A7@SRVEXC00.dupa.dk>
Thanks for the suggestion Rikke, I will work on that. However, I still think the overarching connection between HR and voting is important enough that the HR caucus should consider addressing it also. I will learn more and perhaps the HR caucus can support an initiative presented by Privacy/Security if that becomes appropriate.Saludos, Ginger----- Original Message -----From: Rikke Frank JoergensenSent: Monday, March 13, 2006 5:08 AMSubject: [hr-wsis] SV: Re: HR caucus and post-wsis actions linesHi Ginger
Though I understand your concern not to have e-voting treated as something very specific, I think you need to start by getting the issue on the post wsis table as part of a specific action line.. And here I would def. suggest that you join the Privacy and Security WG, and get in on the privacy / sec. agenda for a start.
Best
Rikke
-----Oprindelig meddelelse-----
Fra: Ginger Paque [mailto:ginger@paque.net]
Sendt: 10. marts 2006 19:13
Til: hr-wsis@iris.sgdg.org
Emne: [hr-wsis] Re: HR caucus and post-wsis actions lines
Meryem and all,
As Meryem pointed out, I am very interested in e-voting and how it can either support or undermine all of our other rights.
Can anyone give me specific suggestions on where to go with this, how to pursue it and include it in the action lines, and how to be sure it gets incorporated in any input we present? This is particularly important because the issue was not addressed in the WSIS documents.
I am willing to work on wording, or presentations, whatever it may be, but I don't have the experience to direct my attention, particularly since it seems that this issue is viewed as very specific, so has to be incorporated properly into the protocols. I personally don't see it as such a "specific" issue because of its overarching implications for all rights, so I need help working it into a format that will really get it on the agenda.
Help, suggestions, observations, comments? Please?
Thanks. Saludos, Ginger
----- Original Message -----
From: Meryem Marzouki
Sent: Wednesday, March 08, 2006 6:47 AM
Subject: [hr-wsis] HR caucus and post-wsis actions lines
Hi again,
Besides the IGF, which is a very important process, we should also
step into the implementation and follow-up of WSIS actions lines.
These actions lines, together with the relevant UN agency to take the
lead on their implementation, are identified in the annex of the
"Tunis Agenda for the Information Society", available in different
languages at: http://www.itu.int/wsis/documents/doc_multi.asp?
lang=en&id=2267|0 (go to the Annex at the end of the document).
ITU has started first discussions on action line C2 (infrastructure),
for example, during a meeting it held recently in Doha (Qatar),
taking the opportunity of one of its conferences (World
Telecommunication Development Conference - WTDC). As a matter of
fact, Anriette Esterhuysen has sent a letter to ITU Secretary General
on behalf of APC, that she reproduced on the plenary list. APC was
mainly raising the issue of CS participation to such meetings held in
different parts of the world, where almost only some governements and
ITU private sector members can attend.
I don't know if there are other consultations that have started.
My point here is to suggest that, according to the competence and
specificities of members of our caucus, we share the work among us
and we try to have caucus members in charge of closely following some
issues/actions lines, and reporting to the caucus so that we can
develop positions and hopefully participate to a large range of
actions lines follow-up.
Typically, Ginger (from UNA Venezuela) has many times expressed her
concerns with the e-voting issue. I know that another caucus member,
CPSR (represented here by Bill), is also working on e-voting. This
would be a good start to follow action line C7 (ICT applications),
and specially e-government. We can certainly identify other members
who would be ready to follow other actions lines.
At the global level, you may have noticed that there is no "human
rights" action line (we have rather an "Ethical dimensions of the
Information Society", C10... when you don't want to talk about
rights, call them "ethics"!!!), and among the more than 15 UN
commissions or agencies respectively in charge of their
implementation and follow-up, one is strangely (?) missing: the
Office of the High Commissioner for Human Righst (OHCHR)!
I really think this deserves an intervention from us, with e.g. a
letter to the UN Secretary General and to the High Commissioner for
Human Rights, deploring this situation and asking for HR explicitly
appearing and highlighted.
Waiting for your comments,
Meryem
--
Working List of the WSIS Human Rights Caucus
Web site : http://www.iris.sgdg.org/actions/smsi/hr-wsis
Public Archives: http://www.iris.sgdg.org/actions/smsi/hr-wsis/list
To post a message to the list, send an email to: hr-wsis@iris.sgdg.org
To subscribe/unsubscribe, send an email to: Meryem.Marzouki@iris.sgdg.org
- References:
- SV: [hr-wsis] Re: HR caucus and post-wsis actions lines
- From: "Rikke Frank Joergensen" <rfj@humanrights.dk>
- Prev by Date: Re: [hr-wsis] Canadian Human Rights Tribunal Issues Internet Hate Decision
- Next by Date: Re: [hr-wsis] SV: HR Caucus and IGF
- Previous by thread: SV: [hr-wsis] Re: HR caucus and post-wsis actions lines
- Index(es):