IRIS Actions / SMSI / Human Rights / List

[Précédent par date] [Index par date] [Suivant by date] [Précédent par thème] [Index par thème] [Suivant par thème]
[Previous by date] [Index by date] [Next by date] [Previous by thread] [Index by thread] [Next by thread]

Fwd: [WSIS CS-Plenary] Speakers for the Summit / my position on nominations from Tunisia



Dear all,

Here is the first of two messages sent to the plenary list that I found worth circulating also on the caucus list. Sorry for those who will receive them twice.
Meryem


Début du message réexpédié :

De: Robert Guerra <rguerra@lists.privaterra.org>
Date: Ven 7 oct 2005 19:17:33 Europe/Paris
À: wsis-cs-plenary Plenary <plenary@wsis-cs.org>
Objet: [WSIS CS-Plenary] Speakers for the Summit / my position on nominations from Tunisia
Répondre à: plenary@wsis-cs.org


[Please note that by using 'REPLY', your response goes to the entire list. Kindly use individual addresses for responses intended for specific people]

Click http://wsis.funredes.org/plenary/ to access automatic translation of this message!
_______________________________________


With the help of Rik and others, the speakers nominating group is working hard to advance the work done in geneva to ready a list for the ITU. Numerous exchanges have taken place so far, which is great.


In the spirit of transparency and openness, i thought it best to share my position (as focal point on the CSB for North America & Europe) on and about nominations from Tunisia with the plenary list.



My position is as follows....


To be honest, the inclusion of Tunisians as proposed speakers at the summit makes be personally shake in disbelief. The names proposed (from Tunisia) are not high enough level persons to speak at the plenary sessions. The caucus they represent are problematic ones, ones which - many, myself included - believe are clearly infiltrated by the tunisian government .


There far better, and much less problematic speakers that MUST be considered in their place. As a point of principle, if we are going to consider tunisians for rountables then we SHOULD also give an equal chance to "independent" civil society from the country. If that is not possible, then , there is no equal opportunity - no consensus, and as such the safest course of action would be to not recommend any Tunisians at all to the ITU.

As you might imagine, this is a point of principle for me. I am passionate about this. There needs to be openness and transparency about this - very - sensitive issue.

Recommendation: remove all Tunisian names all together. If this group recommends one Tunisian name vs. another, we will be lead into a dogfight we can not win. It's a political issue - let the ITU deal with it.

Alternatives: no doubt there are other names from other countries that are not only "less problematic" but, are higher level and involved in information society activities and/or initiatives at a higher level than the Tunisian nominees.


-- Robert Guerra <rguerra@privaterra.org> Director, Computer Professionals for Social Responsibility (CPSR) WSIS Civil Society Bureau, Focal Point for North America & Europe Tel +1 416 893 0377 Fax +1 416 893 0374



_______________________________________________
Plenary mailing list
Plenary@wsis-cs.org
http://mailman.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/plenary