Fwd: [WSIS-CT] Information regarding your contribution to the working documents (declaration and action plan) of WSIS

[Meryem Marzouki <marzouki@ras.eu.org>]

Début du message réexpédié :

> De: "Thomas Ruddy" <thomruddy@yahoo.com>
> Date: Ven 6 juin 2003  16:24:18 Europe/Paris
> À: "'karen banks'" <karenb@gn.apc.org>, <mciver@albany.edu>
> Cc: <ct@wsis-cs.org>, <apc-ir-team@lists.apc.org>, 
> <hr-wsis@iris.sgdg.org>, <thomas.ruddy@ngocongo.org>
> Objet: RE: [WSIS-CT] Information regarding your contribution to the  
> working documents (declaration and action plan) of WSIS
> Répondre à: <thomruddy@yahoo.com>
>
> Colleagues,
> Bill wrote:
>>> The caucuses have their legitimacy through the CS Bureau do they not?
>
> Karen disagreed, and so do I, but for a different reason. As I 
> understand
> it, the caucuses have their legit. through their members (the legit. 
> of the
> CS Plenary being a matter for another day...)
>
> As Charles Geiger from the Exec.Sec. wrote:
> We need the
>>> name of
>>> at least one WSIS-accredited organization/entity (or an organisations
>>> in
>>> consultative status with ECOSOC).
>
> Let's go back to discussing Meryem's proposal of submitting input 
> labelled:
>
>> "WSIS Contribution of the XXXXX Caucus, submitted by XXXXX (accredited
>> organisation(s))"
>
>
> Thomas
>
> ========================================
> Thomas Ruddy, thomruddy@yahoo.com, thomas.ruddy@ngocongo.org,
> http://www.wsis.ethz.ch, Switzerland
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: ct-admin@wsis-cs.org [mailto:ct-admin@wsis-cs.org] On Behalf Of
>> karen banks
>> Sent: Friday, June 06, 2003 3:58 PM
>> To: mciver@albany.edu
>> Cc: ct@wsis-cs.org; apc-ir-team@lists.apc.org; hr-wsis@iris.sgdg.org
>> Subject: Re: [WSIS-CT] Information regarding your contribution to the
>> working documents (declaration and action plan) of WSIS
>>
>> hi bill
>>
>>> The caucuses have their legitimacy through the CS Bureau do they not?
>>
>> No, that is the point. The thematic issues are the domain of the 
>> caucuses
>> and working groups, as represented to this space - the content and 
>> themes
>> group.
>>
>> the bureau is responsible for facilitating participation, fellowship
>> allocations, events organising at the summit etc..
>>
>> the bureau is generating far more 'legitimacy' in the WSIS process, is
>> officially recognised as a 'legitimate' body with the Process, able to
>> meet
>> with it's government counterpart etc, on an 'equal' footing.
>>
>> the caucuses and working groups, do not share that status.
>>
>> karen
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Ct mailing list
>> Ct@wsis-cs.org
>> http://mailman.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/ct
>